Wednesday, 3 April 2013

Post Six Nations Lions XV - Hooker


The season is galloping towards a climax at a pace to match Gethin Jenkins in full flow, and that means that Lions selection isn't too far away.  With RuckedOver dealing with out loosehead props last week, today we turn our attention to those nuggetty aggressive sorts in the middle of the front row – the hookers.

Hooker

I still have this down as potentially a weakness for the Lions, with none of the candidates really impressing on a consistent basis.  Let's take the pre-tournament shoe-in, Rory Best, as an example – the Irishman started the tournament well against Wales but finished it with an ineffectual display against the Italians in which his lineout work demonstrated the same level of precision as a piƱata-bashing-session at an 8-year-old's birthday party.  Richard Hibbard certainly impressed in the latter stages, but then again he was part of an increasingly dominant Welsh pack and, more specifically, between two titans of the front row in Adam Jones and Gethin Jenkins, so it's hard to judge how effective he actually was as an individual since we didn't see any truly stand-out performances.

England's Tom Youngs looked very impressive in parts, with his carrying and defensive work particularly catching the eye, but he was part of a front row that was mauled in Cardiff and his 10 minute lineout-collapse (where he was otherwise solid) could have been very costly in Dublin against Ireland.  Dylan Hartley, the man who (six months ago) was most people's favourite to take the starting 2 shirt, barely got a look-in in a white shirt and, when he did, didn't do enough to suggest he can guarantee himself a spot on the plane.

It may sound like I'm being negative – but perhaps that's just because the two propping positions seem like areas of real strength and next to that, the hooker options feel a tad sparse.  Nevertheless, below are the gents I think should be touring come June time.

TEST STARTER:  RICHARD HIBBARD. He may look like an electrician from a low-budget 1980's adult flick, but the blonde bombshell is more than a little sparky.  He was part of a dominant front row and forward effort, and his lineout was pretty solid for the most part, but it is his aggressive mindset that really gets him the nod in my book.  His physicality in defence in particular will be a big asset to the Lions and, as long as he can stay injury free, I expect to see him start for the Lions in the number 2 shirt.


BENCHER:  TOM YOUNGS.  I said before the Six Nations that this was the easiest spot to call at hooker, and I stand by it.  Despite a couple of throwing wobbles against Ireland, he was mostly solid and his form for Leicester has been superb since, with his ball carrying being a particularly impressive aspect.  With his body shape a geometrically-perfect square and possessing explosive acceleration, Youngs is incredibly hard to put down  and he is the perfect Lions impact player should the men in red be desperate for front foot ball or just wanting to hammer home the advantage.

DIRT TRACKER:  RORY BEST.  I wasn't alone in having Best down as a starter before the 6 Nations but, along with the rest of the Irish pack, he didn't enjoy the finest couple of months.  I don't think he was awful by any means, but a couple of bad lineout wobbles showed he is just fallible as Youngs or Hibbard in this department and, in fact, his success percentage in the Heineken Cup is the lowest of the 3 at just 75%.  That said, he is still a proven first-rate player on his day, a strong performer in the scrum and around the park, and he will have opportunity to impress with Ulster in the Heineken Cup quarter final before selection time.   I can see him challenging for the starting shirt, but for now he just edges out Hartley, who has had a season plagued by injury and bans (not to mention he was taken to the cleaners by Leicester on Saturday), and Ross Ford, who put in a series of manful shifts for Scotland but lacked the real 'punch' his rivals possess.


Who would take your Lions hooker jersey?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Share your views